It’s time to take another look at the fourth film in the
Pirates of the Caribbean franchise. Upon
its initial release I thought it was pretty good. So does it still hold up? Let’s find out.
First off I think my major problem with this film is that it lacks a feeling of being epic. Not that it had to be a big battle for the seas like At World’s End was, but what I mean is that the movie is very small right from the opening scenes. For the opening scenes in the other films we had Elizabeth singing a creepy rendition of “A Pirate’s Life For Me” as we slowly pulled in on her surrounded by a thick fog. The tone is set immediately. We are being brought into a world that is ominous and creepy. The second film showed rain pouring down on Will and Elizabeth’s wedding day. Beckett’s forces swarm over everything, letting us know that the world of the last movie is changing. In the third film we open with Beckett having an iron grip over everything and everyone. People are being hanged in droves and the world we have come to love and see change now seems to be ending for good, and yet through the song we feel there is still hope. With On Stranger Tides we open on a fishing boat and an old guy gets taken to the characters that are going to have about fifteen minutes of screen time total. This does not say brave new world with all new adventures for our heroes to me, this says the scope of drama has shrunk. The movie also appears small in the production choices being made, in the way shots are framed, in the way action moves, and in the stakes.
For one thing this time the team working on the movie seemed
determined to pillage things from the other movies. Like Jack’s gunshot when Teague shoots the solider
in London. While I don’t think
everything in the other two sequels worked at least there they worked to build
on what was already established, like reusing some quotable lines in new ways
and expanded a story that was already self-contained; at the same time though
they brought in new elements. We got new
villains with different motivations than Barbossa but they were still
complex. We got to see that character’s
actions had consequences and we got to see characters and their relationships
change. Here there is some of that with
Jack and Barbossa which I’ll get to later, but for the most part the filmmakers
seemed to think it was more important to stuff in things from the other films
just because their popular rather than building something new and cool to stand
beside the cool stuff the franchise already has.
The first place I noticed this was with the music. I said in my last review that I didn’t care
for the music in this installment and I still don’t. I
still do like the “Jolly Sailor Bold” song, but even that one didn’t stand out
enough for me to gets its name right in the last review. For the rest of the musical landscape much of
it seemed to be used just because it was popular in the other films. Don’t reuse the theme for Barbossa’s skeleton
crew from the first because all it is, is a reminder of the better film I could
be watching. The “He’s a Pirate” theme
is normally used during action scenes, but here it was used when Jack leaves
the court room, why? This isn’t
thrilling, it’s not leading up to a big fight scene don’t use it just because you
think you should.
Speaking of fights I find the fight scenes here are awkward
and hard to follow. The strikes don’t
really look like they’re hitting anything much of the time. Unlike in the first films where there were a
lot of long shots inter cut in the fight scenes. Having everything closer in makes it hard to
follow the action. For instance I had no
idea what was going on in Jack and Angelica’s escape from the English guards
because there wasn’t a clear shot of what she was swinging at to release the
trap door. Also them fighting in the
rafters is yet another thing taken from a better film in the franchise. I didn’t like watching Jack escaping from the
palace, before he gets outside, because I thought the editing on the scene was
clumsy. Jack hits the guards, I think,
one slips on a napkin falls out the window, and Jack gets on the chandelier,
but the pacing doesn’t feel right. It
doesn’t feel like it gets more intense as each new thing happens. It just feels like the movie is going through
the motions and frankly I find that boring. Also there are very few long shots
of ships or locations, probably to mask the fact this wasn’t shot in the
Caribbean. The Queen Anne’s Revenge does
look very nice in the night shots though; and I do like that we see Jack’s eyes
and teeth in close up as he sits in the judge’s robes in London.
Okay the visuals and music are still meh, what else? How about the characters? Well new comer Angelica is interesting
because she is very much a contradiction.
She is a very self-sufficient individual and yet is also seeking the
comfort of a parental figure. I like
that, but I think it could have been developed a bit better. For instance how does she know that
Blackbeard is her father? Why does he
believe that she is his daughter? Why is
having a father so important to her the she forgoes all good sense to stick by
him? This is really rather
frustrating. We know that Blackbeard is
a bad man and to have Angelica constantly defending him and trusting him despite
all that she witnesses him do makes her come off as naive and a bit of an
idiot. This especially true when we take
into account her past relationship with Jack.
She is a woman who was loved and then left by a man she loved deeply,
that should make her wary to trust anyone.
In fact we see that with Jack in that she doesn’t trust him even though
she still loves him. She press-gangs him
into service aboard her father’s ship, she bribes him to make her help him with
the Black Pearl in a bottle, and tries to go to Ponce de Leon’s ship herself instead
of him because she doesn’t think he will come back. She’s a good character but with a bit more
development she could have been a great character.
Moving on to other characters Blackbeard is still the worst
villain in the franchise bar none. I
still think he is just a moustache twirling cackling bad guy and that makes him
really boring. He’s not sympathetic and I
don’t care for that in the least. Davy
Jones is sympathetic, Barbossa is sympathetic, heck even Beckett’s actions are
least somewhat understandable since, as Ted and Terry put it, he’s a man who at
the end of the day just wants to sell more goods. A guy who is evil just for the sake of being
evil isn’t very interesting I find. Although
I will admit his line that if he doesn’t kill a man every now and then they
forget who is, is funny. But this still
makes the attempts to give him some kind of saving grace at the fountain
annoying to me, specifically Jack’s line of your father saved you maybe he’ll
get redemption. No, he drank the chalice
he thought had the tear in it to save his own skin. Angelica only lived because Jack lied about which
was which.
Speaking of Jack I said the first time around that Jack
earned his spot back as one of my favourite Disney characters and he still gets
to keep it. He is helping people for
more than just saving his own skin, that honest streak is back even if it’s a
bit more subtle. I really like that we
get to see him not be captain of a ship here but instead a crewmember and learn
that he is an experienced one. The way
he responds to being thrown out of his hammock and doing labour with Scrum lets
us see that he is an experienced sailor.
I enjoy his sense of honour and duty to the Pearl when he tells
Barbossa, “if that ship be sunk proper you be sunk with her.” After all Jack did go down with his ship. His relationship with Angelica is fun and
interesting, and it’s good that it wasn’t the deep triumph over all love that
Will and Elizabeth’s was. He’ll always
love her but knows better than to be with her.
I still think that less is more with Jack though. He is a cool character and cool things should
be used sparling. I like the last third
of film the most because we switch back and forth between lots of different
characters and I thought that made the film more fun and interesting. However it also showcased a lack of new cast
members here. I like Gibbs, but I do
miss the rest of the crew of the Pearl, and there isn’t really anything good
replacing them. Gibbs gets an expanded
roll and is awesome at it, but Scrum doesn’t hold a candle to Ragetti and Pintel. Serena certainly isn’t the feisty and
mysterious presence like Tia Dalma was, and the cabin boy is only interesting
because I keep thinking back to a documentary of Blackbeard I watched once where
they made reference that the cabin boy might be a girl and I wondered if they
would leave any hint of that here.
Groves and Gilette are fun, but then they get killed a la Norrington in
the last film and that takes away from the awesomeness of them.
The lack of supporting characters is really disappointing
because Jack needs someone to play off of, that’s why he and Will worked so
well together in the first film. Thankfully
though Barbossa still works wonderfully here at that where they are in scenes
together. Both of them on Ponce de Leon’s
ship and getting the chalices back from the Spanish are good stuff. Barbossa himself is great here too. He is still a cutthroat, but like Jack in the
third film his encounter with Blackbeard has changed him. With him there’s one thing that I liked that
was part of the early films and re-used here: Barbossa fighting in a cave from Black Pearl, because we see how much
slower he is now with the crutch than he was there. He has been wounded by Blackbeard. Not just physically, but emotionally. Then the crutch is destroyed and Barbossa
continues to fight on despite that and overcomes that limitation. When he gets to the Queen Anne’s Revenge he
is walking straight and true without the crutch; both his physical crutch and
his emotional crutch with needing to focus his life on Blackbeard and his need
for revenge to the point of throwing in his lot with King George to get what he
needs. He no longer needs that for he is
master of his own fate again. I really like
that when he stabs Blackbeard he’s says it’s for the Pearl, he does care about
that ship just as much as Jack does.
Even with the good stuff with Barbossa and Jack there are
several things plot wise and generally that I don’t care for in this
movie. For example why does King George
give a thumbs up to Barbossa? There’s
bending history a little bit for the sake of atmosphere in your film, all sea legends
are true in this world after all, and then there’s just being stupid.
The whole fortnight timeline doesn’t work at all. At first I thought it worked because they
were traveling from the Caribbean to Florida and that could be done in a two
week window, but no they started travel from London, England as the stupid
location tags so helpfully reminded me.
A quick Google searched turned up that the travel time between London
and the USA by ship at that time was approximately two months. Even if we say that Blackbeard’s ship can
travel faster than others Barbossa and the Spanish arrive at Whitecap Bay at
pretty much the same time and they are using regular sailing ships so that
doesn’t fly. Now the island judging by
the vegetation and the poisonous frogs (should I count it as a mistake that
Barbossa mixed up frogs and toads?) is a bit further south than Florida but the
point still stands. Also it was my
understanding that the quartermaster made the prophecy and then Angelica ran
into Jack in London. Why else would she
capture him? She said her father needed
the fountain to save his life and to get to the fountain they need Jack. Certainly traveling to London and getting
people to join the crew had to take longer than a week.
I still don’t get the whole Serena and Phillip
relationship. I don’t get why they are
so interested in each other or what the whole relationship really has to do
with anything thematically speaking. I
still think it has some connection as an Adam and Eve thing with Serena pulling
Phillip down to the depths at the end, a manifestation of his fall into
temptation, but I don’t get his words before of being lost in the winds and
tides before finding her. Was he having
a crisis of faith? Did he think his life
was wasted as a man of the cloth? What
is that conversation about? What is the
point of this character or Serena apart for being a plot device for the
tear? The one thing I do like about
Phillip though is the connection of faith between him and Angelica. Where Angelica, having said she was in a
convent and ready to take her vows, doesn’t want Phillip killed when Blackbeard
attacks the ship he is on because she fears for Blackbeard’s soul. In fact that would probably have made a
better opening scene. We see Blackbeard
attacking a ship, Phillip being spared, maybe keep Angelica in shadow so we
have some mystery at play before we cut to Spain.
I still think the Spanish were a waste in this film. The theme music they got when Jack and
Barbossa escape their camp is good, but I don’t think their twist at the end of
wanting to destroy the fountain, not use for their own gain was a great moment
for the movie, I just found it anti-climactic.
That’s what I mean by no stakes.
We barely see the Spanish and when we do it’s not to have some big fight
or some political thing with England, it’s to destroy the fountain and leave. As Jack says Barbossa’s crew and Blackbeard’s
crew don’t have a reason to fight each other outside of the fact their captains
are having a fight so that makes the end battle less interesting because no one
outside of Jack, Barbossa, Angelica, and Blackbeard really have good reasons to
be doing what they’re doing.
So to conclude it’s certainly not a bad film, ultimately I
think it’s just okay. My idea that we
might have a reverse Star Trek pattern for the franchise here is holding up in
my opinion. The first one is awesome the
third one is good and the second and this one are both meh. I don’t think the Phillip Serena characters
or their relationship work at all. I
think Jack and Angelica work well as an ex-couple I just wish she had been
given more development. Barbossa is
awesome, Gibbs is awesome, and Jack is great.
I like that they are growing and yet many core traits remain intact. Blackbeard is boring and the look of film and
the music is lacking. But having said
all that I like that just like the first film we close up most things here, but
allow for the possibility of some more stories later. This film wasn’t as well received as the
first trilogy and I can see why, it certainly has its flaws, but if they do
make another one down the road I’ll still go to see because as a whole the
franchise holds up well.
No comments:
Post a Comment